|
Nation-building strategies privileging one identity in Eritrea versus
state- nation building bolstering multiple and complementary identities?
By Fesseha Nair (August 25, 2005)
Today most societies in the
world countries include more than one culture and community. In a
country like Eritrea, one society seeks to dominate the others and such
approach creates tensions and conflict. It is now almost 50 years, that
Eritreans never resolved their internal conflicts by violence. The
victory for one side or the other is not sustainable if it does not
respect the legitimate rights of each nationality in Eritrea.
Peace, stability and
development cannot be maintained by force but by peaceful dialogue and
co-operation.
Currently, policies of
assimilation by the government in power and by some political opposition
organizations are involved in outright suppression of the fundamental
rights of the other ethnic, religious and linguistic communities.
Their nation building
strategies in Eritrea are only privileging on singular identity by
advocating:-
-
Centralisation of political power, depriving of the autonomy of the
other nationalities, all important decisions are made in all political,
economical and social fields where the dominant group constitutes a
majority.
-
Construction
of a unified legal and judicial system, operating in the dominants
group’s language and using its legal traditions, and the abolition of
any pre-existing legal systems used by the other nationalities in their
own territory.
-
Adoption of
official language laws, which define the dominant group’s language as
the only official national language to be used in the bureaucracy,
courts, public services, the army, higher education and other official
institutions.
-
Construction
of nationalized system of compulsory education promoting standardized
curricula and teaching the dominant group’s language, literature and
history and defining them as the “ national” language, literature and
history but calling the other nationals languages as dialects and
sub-nationals.
-
Diffusion of
the dominant group’s language and culture through national cultural
institutions, including state-run media and public museums.
-
Seizure of
lands, forests and fisheries from indigenous people and declaring them”
state or people’s property. “
-
Adoption of
settlement policies encouraging members of the dominant national group
to settle in areas where other nationalities historically resided.
-
Adoption of
immigrant policies that give preference to immigrants who share the same
language, religion or ethnicity as the dominant group.
-
Adoption of
state symbols celebrating the dominant group’s history, heroes and
culture, reflected in such things as the choice national holidays or the
naming of streets, buildings and geographic characteristics (
eliminating the original names of villages by giving them the names of
the dominant group, for example, the village names in Gash, Barka, Sahel
and other places reflect this action)
This strategy of coercion to
ensure unity and stability in Eritrea is not acceptable, in today’s
world of increasing democratization and globalization.
The Eritrean Federal
Democratic Movement will reverse this strategy of building “ nation
state” to “state nation” where the various Eritrean ethnic, religious,
linguistic or indigenous identities can coexist peacefully and
cooperatively by:-
-
Decentralization of political power, eliminating all dominance
oppression by the dominant group. All nationals will have the right to
decide their own destiny.
-
Construction
of diversified legal and judicial system, operating in the interest of
the communities living in specific territory.
-
Adoption of
official languages which define the common interests of all the
nationals to be used in all the public works.
-
Construction
of compulsory schools and curricula promoting the languages of all
nationals, literature and history.
-
Fostering
trust, support and identification among all nationals to build a
democratic state nation through national cultural institutions. Each
national, linguistic and religious group has the right to establish its
own institutes that promote its culture.
-
Adoption of
nation state symbols celebrating all the history, heroes and culture of
all nationals.
-
Returning
the lands, forests and fisheries to its owners.
-
No
settlement policies that brings changes in demography.
The objectives of the
strategy of the Eritrean Federal Democratic movement is to build
multiple and complementary identities where the citizens can find the
institutional and political space to identify with both their country
and their cultural and religious identities, to build their trust in
common institutions and to participate in and support democratic
policies.
National unity can not be
achieved by coercion or imposing a single identity and denunciation of
diversity. Nation building strategies privileging single identity in
Eritrea will fail like that of Amhara in Ethiopia.
The Eritrean Federal
Democratic movement’s and sister organizations like Kunama, Afar, SAGEM,
SEDEGE, and other religious movements strategies that promote
accommodation of diversity are the only effective solutions for ensuring
the longer terms objectives of political stability and social harmony in
Eritrea.
Eritreans, either in the
opposition camp or the government who ignore this reality will never
bring peace and stability in Eritrea but civil wars and disintegration. |