|
Ethnic problems of the
tropical Africa
Haile Ghebru (March 16, 2005)
The
recent publications of nharnet com concerning ethnicity indicate that
the ELF RC is taking a serious research in studying the ethnic problems
in Eritrea. In addition to this we are observing a growing interest
among Eritrean writers on this subject in Eritrean Media. All these
efforts are very important.
I
am convinced that there are ethnic, religious and regional (auragawi)
problems in Eritrea which demand our serious attention. But I am
concerned also by the growing extreme ideas. The tendency which
undermine the problems and the tendency that intend to exaggerate it. I
believe that both this tendencies are not helpful to our democratic
struggle.
While ethnic communities exist in Eritrea there will also be the
interests of each ethnic group alongside the national interests. Ethnic
nihilism and ignoring of the needs of the separate peoples when drawing
up and implementing economic and social development programs not only do
immense harm to the development of interethnic relations but also retard
the effort of nation building. In addition to this the exaggeration of
the separate interest is also unhelpful and has the same damaging
effect. Thus there is a demand for a balanced democratic approach which
embraces the unity and diversity of our people.
Today I am just presenting
notes form Russian scholar R.N.Ismagilov book, Ethnic problems of the
tropical Africa, published 1978.
‘’
There are great differences of opinion among social scientists and
African politicians and public figures on how to accelerate the
integration of ethnically varied populations and to put an end to the
tribal isolation and ethnic discord that are so dangerous to political
stability. The issue of ethnic affiliations is sharply debated; there
being two diametrically opposite points of view. These were distinctly
expressed at the International symposium in Bouake (Ivory Coast) in
1962. The supporters of one view asserted that there should be a
decisive abandonment of tribal self-awareness, which they thought would
speed up integration of the different ethnic groups and create national
unity. In some countries the use of ethnic names and appellations has
even been banned and people are supposed to call themselves solely by
the name of their country.
Representatives of the other view suggested that the existence of many
peoples within one country should not be denied, and that every person
belonged to a definite ethnic group. Sekou Toure, the President of
Guinea, Dr. Julius Nyerere, the President of Tanzania, President Jomo
Kenyatta of Kenya, and others held this view in particular.
In
his programmatic article setting forth the principles for dealing with
the national question in the Republic of Guinea, ‘Ethnic Groups, the
Party, and the National Question’, Sekou Toure has emphasized that
The best form of combating ethnic exclusivism should not consist in a
pure and simple negating of ethnos that well and truly exist, or in the
use of repression of any kind. The best form of struggle against ethnic
exclusivism would be to take into consideration the condition of
existence and flourishing of each ethnos through the development,
consolidation, and even greater prosperity of the whole national
community.’’
Let me quote additional
note.
‘’ While the slogan of a
united nation helped rally the peoples of one country or another against
the external enemy, i.e., colonialism and imperialism, during the
struggle for political independence, the concept sometimes leads to
negative results in the new stage of development, when it is necessary
to resolve internal problems, some of them extremely acute. One of these
results, at best, is to underestimate, and at worst to ignore the
interests of separate peoples, especially national minorities. Such a
policy causes great complications and can cause even greater ones.
Any going too fast and
proclaiming of the united nation when several ethno-social communities
are taking shape, harms both theoretical study of ethnic problems and
practical solution of the national question in contemporary African
states.’’
Let me add another piece.
“The main thing in the
conditions of contemporary Africa, it would seem, should be to consider
a complex solution of the ethnic problems, i.e. not merely the juridical
equality of peoples but primarily elimination of the imbalance in the
development of the different areas and peoples, solution of problems of
state structure taking into account the interests of ethnic minorities,
and so on, That would make for equally favorable opportunities of
economic, social, and cultural development for all the country’s
citizens, irrespective of their ethnic affiliation.
Solution of ethnic
problems is unrealizable without simultaneous solution of the language
problem, which is very acute in almost all African countries, and a
radical restructuring of the system of education and of training
national cadres corresponding as far as possible to the interests of the
small peoples as well as of the big ones.
Consistent application of
the principle of actual equality, the granting of various forms of
autonomy (taking historical and political development into account) on
the maximum democratic bases compatible with a strong central authority
would undoubtedly, in our view, encourage a more effective solution of
the problem of national minorities. The training of an adequate number
of cadres belonging to all the ethnic groups in any one county, without
exception, would give the state authorities and ruling parties the
chance to carry out the personnel policy adopted in their programs more
consistently. One of the ugliest ulcers of the contemporary Africa
states machine-its monopolization by individual ethnic groups – would
then gradually be healed.’’
And my last note:
“
Democratic measures to deal with ethnic problems presuppose the
following: equal rights for all peoples, big and small; the rooting out
and suppression of discrimination of every kind or, on the contrary, of
any kind of ethnic privilege; a democratic state structure that
guarantees the equal development of ethnic minorities; an absence of
compulsion in dealing with the language question, respect for the
national culture, creeds, and traditions of backward peoples, and help
for them in closing the gap in standards of economic and social
development, and so on.’’ |